Strategies, Tactics, and Techniques to Mitigate Against AI in Tertiary Education: Preserving Academic Integrity and Credibility

Authors

  • Dr. Stanley A. V. Paul (Sr.) Professor, University of Excellence, Management and Business (U.E.M.B.), Georgetown, GUYANA
  • Stanley A. V. Paul (Jr.) Professor, University of Excellence, Management and Business (U.E.M.B.), Georgetown, GUYANA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.4.3.26

Keywords:

Artificial Intelligence, Academic Integrity, Tertiary Education, Mitigation Strategies, Educational Policy

Abstract

The proliferation of artificial intelligence (AI) in tertiary education poses significant challenges to academic integrity and credibility. This study explores effective strategies, tactics, and techniques to mitigate these risks. Through a comprehensive literature review, analysis of current practices, and case studies, the research offers actionable recommendations for educators and policymakers. The findings highlight the importance of a multifaceted approach, combining technological solutions, pedagogical reforms, and ethical guidelines to uphold the standards of academic integrity in the face of AI advancements.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.

Bertram Gallant, T. (2017). Academic Integrity in the 21st Century: A Teaching and Learning Imperative. Jossey-Bass.

Brown, G., & Marsh, H. (2020). Addressing the ethical implications of AI in education. Educational Ethics Journal, 9(1), 89-104.

Dawson, P., & Sutherland-Smith, W. (2020). Can markers detect contract cheating? Results from a pilot study. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43

Downloads

Published

2024-05-25

How to Cite

Paul (Sr.), S. A. V., & Paul (Jr.), S. A. V. (2024). Strategies, Tactics, and Techniques to Mitigate Against AI in Tertiary Education: Preserving Academic Integrity and Credibility. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 4(3), 133–135. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.4.3.26

Issue

Section

Articles

Most read articles by the same author(s)