The Use of MOOCs to Change the Teaching of Literature Retrieval
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.2.1.8Keywords:
MOOCs, classic literature, digital age, literature retrievalAbstract
The limits of the classic literature retrieval course teaching approach are becoming more obvious as information and communication technology advances in the digital age. The emergence of MOOCs (Massive Open Online Courses) has a significant influence on conventional literature retrieval course instruction, since it not only pushes but also gives the tools and techniques for improvement. The MOOCs literature retrieval course has transformed the teaching idea of the literature retrieval course. The evaluation mechanism is based on the construction of flipping the classroom lecture method of the instructors and students' mutual assessment, which is one of the feasible solutions for the teaching reform of literary retrieval course.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Aoshuang, D., & Tianha, G. (2019). Exploration and Practice of Practice Course Teaching Model Based on PBL Teaching Model. Science Innovation, 7(4), 129. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.si.20190704.15
A Brief Analysis on How to Realize the Effective Combination of Online and Offline Teaching of Ideological and Political Course in Colleges and Universities in Massive Open Online Course. (2021). Foreign Language Science and Technology Journal Database Educational Science. https://doi.org/10.47939/es.v2i3.30
Kaushik, A. (2019). Roles of University Libraries in MOOCs. Pearl : A Journal of Library and Information Science, 13(3), 223. https://doi.org/10.5958/0975-6922.2019.00029.9
Kumar, R., & Kumar, N. (2018). Massive Open Online Courses (MOOCs) in Indian Higher Education System. Contemporary Social Sciences, 27(1), 155–158. https://doi.org/10.29070/27/57225
Liyanagunawardena, T. R., Lundqvist, K., Mitchell, R., Warburton, S., & Williams, S. A. (2019). A MOOC Taxonomy Based on Classification Schemes of MOOCs. European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning, 22(1), 85–103. https://doi.org/10.2478/eurodl-2019-0006
Ma, J. (2019). Developing Joint R&D Institutes between Chinese Universities and International Enterprises in China’s Innovation System: A Case at Tsinghua University. Sustainability, 11(24), 7133. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247133
McClure, M. W. (2014). MOOCs, Wicked Problems, and the Spirit of the Liberal Arts. The Journal of General Education, 63(4), 269–286. https://doi.org/10.1353/jge.2014.0024
Piggott, M. (2019). Six things you should know about archives. ANZTLA EJournal, 42, 7–10. https://doi.org/10.31046/anztla.v0i42.1125
Purcell, M. (2016). Clumber, Nottinghamshire: The Rise and Fall of a Ducal Library. Library & Information History, 32(1–2), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.1080/17583489.2015.1128644
Siry, C. A. (2011). Emphasizing collaborative practices in learning to teach: coteaching and cogenerative dialogue in a field‐based methods course. Teaching Education, 22(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/10476210.2010.520699
Teaching Mode Reform for Ideological and Political Courses in Colleges and Universities in the Information Age. (2020). Journal of Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.7176/jep/11-11-06
Wikipedia contributors. (2022, February 10). Massive open online course. Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Massive_open_online_course
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.