The Feminine and Nature: Women’s Ecological Prospects and the Fall of Androcentrism
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.2.12Keywords:
Androcentrism, anthropocentrism, ecofeminism, environmental crisis, interconnectednessAbstract
Ecofeminism, a term coined by French feminist Françoise d’Eaubonne in 1974, attempts to construct a viable environmental ethics, considering possible links between the oppression of women and that of nature. Since its inception, ecofeminism postulates a logical association between the perception, representation, and treatment of women and the natural sphere by patriarchy and proffers a clear understanding of one by, perforce, acquiring knowledge about the other. This movement, in fact, has gained momentum in recent decades in the form of reactionary theorizations and praxes against androcentrism (male-centrism) and anthropocentrism (human-centrism), the two driving forces behind the current environmental crisis. The ecofeminist stance, a posteriori, gives a philosophical account that questions male-based ideology and relates it to historical sexism, gender constructs, and the ecocidal attitude toward the ecosphere. Joining women with ecology proposes a full-fledged ground for comprehending and dismantling androcentrism and, concurrently, a mediation for the current environmental quandary. Ecofeminism is, in fact, the only discipline that views patriarchy as the higher power behind all sorts of suppression, deeming it an obstacle to social and political transformation. The movement, ergo, seeks to put an end to patriarchal forms of domination, change our conceptualization of women in modern culture, and assert the interconnectedness of the entire ecosphere.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Althusser, L. (2001). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Lenin and philosophy and other essays (B. Brewster, Trans., pp. 85–126). Monthly Review Press.
Birkeland, J. (1993). Ecofeminism: Linking theory and practice. In G. Gaard (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, animals, nature (pp. 13–59). Temple University Press.
de Beauvoir, S. (2010). The second sex (C. Borde & S. Malovany-Chevallier, Trans.). Vintage Books.
Gaard, G. (1993). Living interconnections with animals and nature. In G. Gaard (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, animals, nature (pp. 1–12). Temple University Press.
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1976). The German ideology (C. Smith, Trans., 3rd ed.). Progress Publishers.
McKibben, B. (1990). The end of nature. Anchor Books.
Ortner, S. (1974). Is female to male as nature is to culture? In M. Z. Rosaldo & L. Lamphere (Eds.), Woman, culture, and society (pp. 67–87). Stanford University Press.
Plumwood, V. (1993). Feminism and the mastery of nature. Routledge.
Ruether, R. R. (1975). New woman/new earth: Sexist ideologies and human liberation. The Seabury Press.
Ruether, R. R. (1993). Ecofeminism: Symbolic and social connections of the oppression of women and the domination of nature. In C. J. Adams (Ed.), Ecofeminism and the sacred (pp. 65–80). Continuum.
Soper, K. (2000). Naturalized woman and feminized nature. In L. Coupe (Ed.), The green studies reader: From romanticism to ecocriticism (pp. 139–143). Routledge.
The Holy Bible: New International Version. (2009/2010). Hodder & Stoughton.
Warren, J. K. (1997). Taking empirical data seriously. In J. K. Warren (Ed.), Ecofeminism: Women, culture, nature (pp. 1–15). Indiana University Press.
Wittgenstein, L. (1972). On certainty (G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright, Eds.; D. Paul & G. E. M. Anscombe, Trans.). Harper & Row.
Wollstonecraft, M. (2008). A vindication of the rights of woman: With strictures on political and moral subjects. Cosimo, Inc.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ilyass Chetouani, Larbi Touaf

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.