Role and Importance of Comparative Study of Public Administration
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.5.1.2Keywords:
public administration, comparison, management, organizationAbstract
The study of comparative public administration, as one of the important branches of administrative sciences, plays a key role in a deeper understanding of administrative and political systems in different countries. This approach provides the basis for evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of various systems by comparative analysis of administrative structures, processes and functions.
The importance of this type of study is not only in identifying the best practices and efficient models of public administration, but also in identifying common global challenges such as administrative corruption, bureaucratic inefficiency and how to improve democratic governance. The comparative study of public administration also enables researchers and policymakers to assess the impact of cultural, economic, and political factors on the functioning of administrative systems and to provide innovative and evidence-based solutions for structural reforms. This type of study, especially in the era of globalization and the increasing complexity of governance issues, is considered an essential tool for promoting transparency, accountability and efficiency in government institutions.
In this article, while explaining the theoretical foundations of the comparative study, examples of successful international experiences and their impact on improving decision-making and policy-making processes in different societies have been analyzed.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Phidia, BIL. Public administration, the concept and theories of public administration. Translation: Farhad Soltani.Year 2018. Balkh book publisher.
Danish, serwer. Basic rights of Afghanistan.Year 2012. Amiri Publications.
Dahl, "The Science of Public Administration: Three Problems", Public Administration Review, Vll (1947), pp, 1-11.
in Ferrel Heady, "Comparative Public Administration: Concerns and Priorities", in Heady and L. Stokes (eds.), Papers in Comparative Public.
Administration (Michigan, 1962),p.4. 3. Fred W. Riggs, Administration in Debeloping Countries (Boston, 1064), p. 12.
Ferrel Heady, Public Administration: A Comparative Perspective (Prenice Hall, 1966), pp. 9-13.
William C. Mitchell, "The Shape of Political Theory to Come: From Political Sociology to Political Sociology to Political Economy, in S. M. Lipset (ed.) Politics and The Socil Sciences (New York, 1969), p. xvii.
V. N. Viswanathan, Comparative Public Administration (New Delhi, 1995), p.21.
Ramesh K. Arora, Comparative Public Administration, 1996, pp.19-20.
Ferrel Heady, "Comparative Public Administration: Concerns and Priorities", om [a[ers om Comparative Public Administration, Ferrel Heady and Sybil Stokes (eds.) 1962, p. 3.
Fred Riggs, "Trends in the Comparative Study of Public Administration", International Review of Administrative Sciences, XXVII (1962), pp. 9-15.
Ramesh K. Arora, Comparative Public Administration, 1996, p.105.
Shumsun Nisa Ali, Eminent Administrative Thinkers, 1990. Pp. 95-96. Ibid. p. 101.
Keith m. Henderson, "Emerging Synthesis in American Public Admininstration" New York, 1966, p.15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Fazal Rahman Ayoubi, Nazir Jan Noori
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.