The Impacts of Secessionism within the Framework of International Relations: The Cases of Crimea and Donbass

Le Quang Thai

doi:10.55544/ijrah.4.6.1

Authors

Le Quang Thai Faculty of International Relations and Communication, Ho Chi Minh City University of Foreign Languages – Information Technology, VIETNAM. https://orcid.org/0009-0004-1691-842X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.4.6.1

Keywords:

Secessionism, International Relations, Crimea, Donbass, Ukraine-Russia War

Abstract

Secessionism is a significant issue in international relations, having persisted throughout history as a driving force behind numerous conflicts. In recent times, this issue has become more prominent as the world observes the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. Central to this conflict are the separatist movements in Crimea and the Donbass region, which have played a key role in triggering the escalation of hostilities. This article aims to clarify the definition, characteristics, and impacts of secessionism within the framework of international relations, with a focus on these two practical cases: the Crimean Peninsula and the Donbass region in Eastern Ukraine. Using qualitative research methods and realism, the study will examine how secessionist movements can influence the stability of global political order. Ultimately, the article seeks to contribute to a deeper understanding of how secessionist ideologies can serve as catalysts for international conflicts, as seen in the cases of Crimea and Donbass, and how they reshape the geopolitical landscape.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Aleksey Filippov (2024). Ukraine: Report reveals war’s long-term impact which will be felt ‘for generations’. UN News - Global perspective Human stories. https://news.un.org/en/story/2024/02/1146842

Andrea Wagner, Jianna Marin & Dorian Kroqi (2019). The Catalan struggle for independence and the role of the European Union. Regional Science Policy & Practice. Volume 11, Issue 5, 787-804. https://doi.org/10.1111/rsp3.12218

Berkii, T. (2019). Separatism — the Main Threat for Internal Security. Internal Security, 11(2), 109-117. https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.8210.

Glen Anderson, Secession in International Law and Relations: What Are We Talking About?, 35 Loy. Loyola of Los Angeles International and Comparative Law Review, 343 (2013). Available at: https://digitalcommons.lmu.edu/ilr/vol35/iss3/1

Hossein Akbari (2023). Geopolitical Challenges in the Formation of Nations in Central Asia and the Caucasus; A Comparative Study. Geopolitics Quarterly, Volume: 19, No 2, 156-193.

Jonathan Masters (2023). Ukraine: Conflict at the Crossroads of Europe and Russia. Council on Foreign Relations. https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/ukraine-conflict-crossroads-europe-and-russia, accessed on 17 October 2024.

Krijestorac, M. (2016). Role of an Agent in (un)Keeping the Multiethnic State Together: The Case of the Secession of Kosovo. Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 1-15.

Kubijovyč, Volodymyr, ed. “H.” In Encyclopedia of Ukraine: Volume II: G-K, 108–293. University of Toronto Press, 1988. http://ezproxy.lib.uconn.edu/login?url=https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.3138/j.ctt15jvz0h.3.

Marie Dumoulin (2024). Ukraine, Russia, and the Minsk agreements: A post-mortem. European Council on Foreign Relations. https://ecfr.eu/article/ukraine-russia-and-the-minsk-agreements-a-post-mortem/

Peter Dickinson (2020). How Ukraine’s Orange Revolution shaped twenty-first century geopolitics. Atlantic Council. https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/blogs/ukrainealert/how-ukraines-orange-revolution-shaped-twenty-first-century-geopolitics/

Ryabinin Y (2017), The basic causes of the temporary separatism, Journal of Geography, Politics and Society, Volume 7 (2017), Issue 1 (2017), pp. 5 – 9. https://doi.org/10.4467/24512249JG.17.001.6200

Ryan Griffiths (2016). The State of Secession in International Politics. E-International Relations. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/pdf/65948, accessed on 10 October 2024.

Sabine Fischer (2019). The Donbas Conflict: Opposing Interests and Narratives, Difficult Peace Process. SWP Research Paper 5. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik German Institute for International and Security Affairs. https://www.swp-berlin.org/publications/products/research_papers/2019RP05_fhs.pdf

Shumet Amare Zeleke (2023). Self-determination, secession, and indigeneity in Ethiopia's federation. Social Sciences & Humanities Open. Volume 7, Issue 1, 2023, 100415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2023.100415

Tuminez, A. S. (2003). Nationalism, Ethnic Pressures, and the Breakup of the Soviet Union. Journal of Cold War Studies, 5(4), 81–136. https://www.jstor.org/stable/26925339