Predatory Journals and Afghan University Instructors; The Extent of Usage, Factors and Impact- Acknowledging Authors to Manage Their Publication Process
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.4.3.29Keywords:
Predatory journals, reputable, authentic journals, Afghan university instructorsAbstract
Purpose: As specialists having seen that a large number of Afghan authors throw their hard work and efforts into a trash along with an exuberant amount of their money, we conducted this study to find the root causes of predatory publishing among Afghan university instructors.
Methodology: looking at the type of research problem we adopted survey design. We administered a Google Forms survey questionnaire containing both close and open ended questions to which 230 Afghan university instructors responded.
Findings: The results demonstrated that a large number of Afghan university teachers get published in predatory journals for several reasons. These instructors (2.83) heavily relied on their guide teachers’ and colleagues, thus made publications based on their order or recommendation. Others (3.4) had no idea how to spot or what to do to identify predatory journals. Among them some (3.17) were either pushed or compelled themselves to publish perpetually. A number of theses teachers (3.39) knew not about predatory publishing, especially new recruited ones. Others (3.52) found it difficult to distinguish between authentic and predatory journals and a small number of them (3.65) could not afford the publication fees required by high standard, reputable journals.
Theoretical framework: As indicated we first identified themes and then conducted survey to find evidence for accepting or rejecting them. The existing theories were further explored through the study.
Implications: the study opens the gate for further studies and actions needed by practitioners especially calling on officials at the Ministry of Higher Education of Afghanistan to prevent predatory publishing.
Value: Not only will this paper inform policy makers and practitioners to take steps but will also help authors get aware that a work can be invalid and be cautious.
Limitations: This study only provides the extent, impact and reasons of predatory publishing by Afghan authors and beware them of the danger. Therefore, further study, in particular, action study is needed in their own language to help them be able to manage their scholarly publications.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Beal, J. (2012). Predatory journals are corrupting open access. Nature, 489(7415), 197.
Brown, S. C., Stevens, R. A., Jr., Troiano, P. F., & Schneider, M. K. (2002). Exploring complex phenomena: Grounded theory in student affairs research. Journal of College Student Development, 43(2), 173–183.
Chen, L. X., Su, S. W., Liao, C. H., Wong, K. S., & Yuan, S. M. (2023). An open automation system for predatory journal detection. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 2976. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30176-z.
Christensson, P. (2017, June 21). WHOIS Definition. Retrieved 2024, May 2, from https://techterms.com
Clark, A., & Thompson, D. (2017). Five (bad) reasons to publish your research in predatory journals. Journal of advanced nursing, 2499-2501. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.13090.
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research, (6th Ed.). Pearson.
Dimitrije Curcic (June 1, 2023). How many academic journals are there? Retrieved Dec 2, 2023 fromhttps://wordsrated.com/number-of-academic-papers-publishedperyear/#:~:text=As%20of%202020%2C%20there%20are,rate%20of%202.56%25%20every%20year.
George, T. (2022, September 15). How to Write Recommendations in Research | Examples & Tips. Scribbr. Retrieved 5 December 2023, from https://www.scribbr.co.uk/thesis-dissertation/research-recommendations/
Happe, L. E. (2020). Distinguishing predatory from reputable publishing practices. Journal of managed care & specialty pharmacy, 26(8), 956-960. https://doi.org/10.18553/jmcp.2020.26.8.956.
Krawczyk, F., & Kulczycki, E. (2021). On the geopolitics of academic publishing: The mislocated centers of scholarly communication. Tapuya: Latin American Science, Technology and Society, 4(1), 1984641. https://doi.org/10.1080/25729861.2021.1984641
Kurt, S. (2018). Why do authors publish in predatory journals? Learned Publishing, 31(2), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1150.
Nunan, D., & Bailey, K. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research a comprehensive guide. Heinle.
Richtig, G., Berger, M., Lange‐Asschenfeldt, B., Aberer, W., & Richtig, E. (2018). Problems and challenges of predatory journals. Journal of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology, 32(9), 1441-1449. https://doi.org/10.1111/jdv.15039.
Stake, R. E. (1983). Two Observations. Evaluation News, 4(3), 72-74. https://doi.org/10.1177/109821408300400324
University of Victoria. (2023, Dec,1). What's a journal? What's a journal? - University of Victoria (uvic.ca)
Vakil, C. (2019). Predatory journals: Authors and readers beware. Canadian Family Physician, 65(2), 92-94.
مهدي دادخواه, و محمد لگزیان. (2017). پاسخ به یک فرضیه آزمون نشده: ناآگاهی محققان دلیل گرایش به مجلات نامعتبر. Iranian Journal of Emergency Medicine, 4(2). https://journals.indexcopernicus.com/api/file/viewByFileId/342067
Krawczyk, F., & Kulczycki, E. (2021). How is open access accused of being predatory? The impact of Beall's lists of predatory journals on academic publishing. The Journal of Acad emic Librarianship, 47(2), 102271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acalib.2020.102271
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Abdul Rahman ADIB, Abdul Aziz Hakimi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.