The Impact of Technological Innovation on Income Inequality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.1.1.7Keywords:
Technological innovation, Income inequality, Employment polarization, Economic growthAbstract
This study investigates how technology innovation affects income inequality trends by analysing occupational and salary data via econometric methods and studying tech platforms through case studies. The results indicate that automation has greatly divided work opportunities, and skills gaps are a crucial factor contributing to the increasing salary differences for technical degrees. Tech platforms are showing winner-take-all consequences by concentrating half of the sector's revenues. Innovation expands the economy, yet technological changes may still favour certain tiny groups. Specific policy measures focusing on skills development, institutional changes, and promoting competition are necessary to ensure that productivity increase benefits everyone.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Barney, J. B., & Mackey, A. (2018). Monopoly profits, efficiency profits, and teaching strategic management. Academy of Management Learning & Education, 17(3), 359-373.
Criscuolo, C., Martin, R., Overman, H. G., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). Some causal effects of an industrial policy. American Economic Review, 109(1), 48-85.
Davis, D. R., Mengus, E., & Michalski, T. K. (2020). Labor market polarization and the great divergence: Theory and evidence (No. w26955). National Bureau of Economic Research.
Dolata, U., Schrape, J. F., & Dolata, U. (2018). Internet companies: Market concentration, competition and power. Collectivity and Power on the Internet: A Sociological Perspective, 85-108.
Magavern, S., & Fleron, L. J. (2019). Labor Takes the High Road: How Unions Make Western New York More Prosperous and Equitable.
Özkiziltan, D., & Hassel, A. (2020). Humans versus machines: an overview of research on the effects of automation of work. Available at SSRN 3789992.
Palma, J. G. (2019). Behind the Seven Veils of Inequality. What if it's all about the Struggle within just One Half of the Population over just One Half of the National Income?. Development and Change, 50(5), 1133-1213.
Peugny, C. (2019). The decline in middle-skilled employment in 12 European countries: New evidence for job polarisation. Research & Politics, 6(1), 2053168018823131.
Rao, N. D., Sauer, P., Gidden, M., & Riahi, K. (2019). Income inequality projections for the shared socioeconomic pathways (SSPs). Futures, 105, 27-39.
Reis, C., Ruivo, P., Oliveira, T., & Faroleiro, P. (2020). Assessing the drivers of machine learning business value. Journal of Business Research, 117, 232-243
Sharma, V., Nigam, V., & Sharma, A. K. (2020). Cognitive analysis of deploying web applications on microsoft windows azure and amazon web services in global scenario. In Materials Today: Proceedings (Vol. 11).
Srivastava, R. (2019). Emerging dynamics of labour market inequality in India: Migration, informality, segmentation and social discrimination. The Indian Journal of Labour Economics, 62, 147-171.
Vasilev, V. L., Gapsalamov, A. R., Akhmetshin, E. M., Bochkareva, T. N., Yumashev, A. V., & Anisimova, T. I. (2020). Digitalization peculiarities of organizations: A case study. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 7(4), 3173.
Vasilescu, M. D., Serban, A. C., Dimian, G. C., Aceleanu, M. I., & Picatoste, X. (2020). Digital divide, skills and perceptions on digitalisation in the European Union—Towards a smart labour market. PloS one, 15(4), e0232032
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Dr. Babita Neeraj Shukla
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.