Transitivity in Pope Francis’ Speech in Morocco: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Analysis

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.6.7

Keywords:

Meaning-making, Pope Francis, Transitivity, Speech, Systemic Functional Linguistics

Abstract

The way we speak and the words we choose to convey a certain message are not neutral. They are overloaded with certain meanings that represent our worldview, namely when delivered by most influential people like religious leaders and used in contexts which are ideologically constructed like that of the speech of Pope Francis with his symbolic power and role in religious diplomacy. The main aim of this study is to investigate the construction of experiential meanings in Pope Francis' historical speech during his apostolic journey to Morocco on March 19, 2019, by examining the specific linguistic choices employed. This study employs the transitivity model within the framework of systemic functional linguistics (SFL) as its theoretical foundation for analysis. Precisely, using quantitative analysis, this paper endeavors to address two key questions: Firstly, what distributions and patterns of transitivity has Pope Francis utilized in constructing experiential meanings in his speech in Morocco? Second, what functions do the transitivity processes and each participant involved have in the delivered speech text, aiding the speaker in conveying their intention? The dataset comprises 182 clauses extracted from the aforementioned speech. The results of this study showed that Pope Francis employed six types of transitivity processes, totaling 186 processes. Yet, material processes, constituting 62%, and mental processes, comprising 15%, were identified as dominant, suggesting their significant roles in conveying vibrant information in his speech that aimed to enhance dialogue and foster friendly relations between Catholicism and Islam, promoting cooperation in the construction and establishment of a world characterized by sincere, courageous, and essential collaboration. The findings therefore indicate that transitivity choices play a crucial role in conveying implicit meanings.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Abdulsada, M. (2021). Narratology in religious discourse: The Pope's Speech in Iraq. Wasit University. Doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.30217.16484

Ardiansyah, Y. (2012). Pope Francis' historical speech delivered in front of the U.S. congress in 2015. Bachelor thesis. The school of foreign languages: Indonesia. Retrieved from https://fr.slideshare.net/YusepArdiansyah/transitivity-in-pope-franciss-speech-addressed-to-u-s-congress.

Barker, C. (2001). Cultural studies & discourse analysis. London: Sage Publication Ltd.

Bloor, T. & Bloor, M. (2004). The functional analysis of English. Great Britain: Hodder Arnold.

Brown, G. & Yule, G. (1983). Discourse analysis. Australia. Cambridge University Press.

Chalimah, S. N., Santosa, R., Djatmika, E. T., & Wiranto, T. (2020). Meaning beyond the clause in critical discourse analysis: ideational function with systemic functional linguistics approach (Universitas Sebelas Maret, Indonesia) retrieved from https://www.scitepress.org/Papers/2018/82152/82152.pdf

Chruszczewski, P.P. (2003). American presidential discourse: An analysis. Berlin: Logos.

Cook, G. (1992).The discourse of advertising. (2nd Edition). London: Routledge.

Eggins, S. (2004). An introduction to systemic functional linguistics (2nd Edition). London: Continuum.

Emilia, E. (2014). Introducing functional grammar. Bandung: Pustaka Jaya.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. London: Longman.

Fairclough, A. (2001). Better day coming: Blacks and equality, 1890-2000. New York: Viking.

Fowler, R. (1986). Linguistic criticism. London: Oxford University Press.

Gee, J. P. (2014). How to do discourse analysis. London: Routledge.

Gerot, L. & Wignell, P. (1994). Making sense of functional grammar. New South Wales: Gerd Stabler.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1967). Language structure and language function. Middlesex: Penguin.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1978). Language as social semiotic: the social interpretation of language and meaning. London: Arnold.

Halliday, M. A.K. (1985). An introduction to functional grammar. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M.A.K. (1994). An Introduction to functional grammar. (2nd Edition). London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2000). Construing experience through meaning: A language- based approach to Cognition. Open linguistic series. Continuum International.

Halliday, M. & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Introduction to functional grammar (4th Edition). London and New York: Routledge.

Harris, Z. S. (1952). Discourse analysis. A journal of the Linguistic Society of America, 28(1), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.2307/409987

Machin, D. & Mayer, A. (2012). How to do critical discourse analysis. Los Angeles: SAGE.

Paltridge, B. (2006). Discourse analysis: An introduction. London: Continuum.

Teich, E. (1999). Systemic functional grammar in natural language generation. London: Bookcraft Ltd.

Wood, L. A., & Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.

Zhang, Y. (2017). Transitivity analysis of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s first television debate. Journal of applied linguistics & English literature, 6 (7), 65- 72. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.6n.7p.65

Downloads

Published

2023-12-05

How to Cite

EL Hadifi, M. (2023). Transitivity in Pope Francis’ Speech in Morocco: A Systemic Functional Linguistic Analysis. Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities, 3(6), 59–67. https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.6.7