An Overview of the Conceptualization, Theoretical Foundations and Rationale for Developing a Local Curriculum

Sapana Adhikari; Rajendra Kunwar

doi:10.55544/ijrah.3.4.17

Authors

Sapana Adhikari Lecturer of Education, Tribhuvan University, Mahendra Ratna Campus, Tahachal, NEPAL.
Rajendra Kunwar Associate Professor of Mathematics Education, Tribhuvan University, Sanothimi Campus, Bhaktapur, NEPAL. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2195-5696

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.4.17

Keywords:

Conceptualization, Local curriculum development, Student-centered education, Theoretical foundations

Abstract

This paper presents an overview of local curriculum development, which involves designing a curriculum that is customized to the specific needs and context of a particular school, community, or region. The conceptualization and theoretical foundations of this approach are based on the principles of student-centered education, cultural responsiveness, and meeting the needs of the local community. The rationale for local curriculum development is based on the belief that a personalized curriculum can enhance student engagement and achievement, address their needs and interests, promote equity and inclusion, and encourage innovation. In conclusion, this paper asserts that local curriculum development is an essential aspect of modern education that can improve the effectiveness and engagement of the education system by better serving the needs and interests of students.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Giroux, H. A. (2019). Utopian thinking in dangerous times: Critical pedagogy and the project of educated hope. In Utopian pedagogy (pp. 25-42). University of Toronto Press.

Sharma, M. K., & Bista, K. (2019). Curriculum development in Nepal: Current status and challenges. International Journal of Research in Social Sciences, 9(4), 79-89.

Bhetuwal, K. P. (2022). Effectiveness of local curriculum implementation in Nepal. Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 27(2), 28-33. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2702022833

Henderson, J. G. (2001). Curriculum planning: A handbook for professionals. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Dewey, J. (1916). Democracy and education: An introduction to the philosophy of education. New York: The Macmillan Company.

Geertz, C. (1983). Local knowledge: Further essays in interpretive anthropology. New York: Basic Books.

Bowles, S., & Gintis, H. (1985). Schooling in capitalist America: Educational reform and the contradictions of economic life. New York: Basic Books.

Ravitch, D. (2010). The death and life of the great American school system: How testing and choice are undermining education. New York: Basic Books.

Stabback, P. (2016). What makes a quality curriculum? Current and Critical Issues in Curriculum and Learning, 2016, Report 2.

Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. L. (1999). Relationships of knowledge and practice: Teacher learning in communities. Review of Research in Education, 24(1), 249-305.

Amponsah, P. N. (2017). The role of stakeholders in curriculum development: A case study of the Senior High School curriculum in Ghana. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(21), 60-66.

UNESCO. (2015). A guide for ensuring inclusion and equity in education. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000233769 ↗

Alozie, N., Lundh, P., Laguarda, K., Parker, C. E., Fujii, R., and McBride, B. (2021). Designing for Diversity Part 1. Where is equity and inclusion in curriculum design? Rockville, MD: National Comprehensive Center at Westat.

Lopes, A. P. (2017). Local curriculum development for quality education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 49(3), 372-390.

Henderson, A. T., Mapp, K. L., Johnson, V. R., & Davies, D. (2007). Beyond the bake sale: The essential guide to family-school partnerships. New York: The New Press.

Johnson, L., Adams, S., & Cummins, M. (2010). The Horizon Report: 2010 K-12 Edition. Austin, TX: The New Media Consortium.

Bourdieu, P. (1977). Cultural reproduction and social reproduction. In J. Karabel & A. H. Halsey (Eds.), Power and ideology in education (pp. 487-511). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

Freire, P. (2018). Pedagogy of the oppressed (50th-anniversary ed.). Bloomsbury Academic.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). But that's just good teaching: The case for culturally relevant pedagogy. Theory into Practice, 34(3), 159-165.

Stembridge, A. (2019). Culturally responsive education in the classroom: An equity framework for pedagogy (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429441080

Sobel, D. (1996). Beyond ecophobia: Reclaiming the heart in nature education. Orion, 15(3), 52-55.

Stanton-Salazar, R. D. (2011). A social capital framework for understanding the socialization of racial minority children and youths. Harvard Educational Review, 81(3), 330-366.

Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Harvard University Press.

Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Multilingual Matters.

Stoecker, R. (2016). Liberating service learning and the rest of higher education civic engagement. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.

Hooks, B. (1994). Teaching to transgress: Education as the practice of freedom. New York: Routledge.

Apple, M. W. (1993). Official knowledge: Democratic education in a conservative age. New York: Routledge.

Piaget, J. (1952). The origins of intelligence in children. New York: International Universities Press.

Thomas, J. W. (2000). A review of research on project-based learning. San Rafael, CA: Autodesk Foundation.

Ausubel, D. P. (1963). The psychology of meaningful verbal learning. New York: Grune & Stratton.

Brooks, J. G., & Brooks, M. G. (1993). The case for constructivist classrooms. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Bruner, J. S. (1990). Acts of meaning. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1989). Cooperative learning: Theory and research. Edina, MN: Interaction Book Company.

Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in a social context. New York: Oxford University Press.

Lai, M., & McNaughton, S. (2020). Local curriculum innovation in Hong Kong: A case study. In S. McNaughton, J. L. Miller, M. Brownsberger, & J. D. Fletcher (Eds.), Curriculum innovation in changing contexts: Exploring relationships between education, poverty, and inequality (pp. 185-200). Routledge.

Lee, L. T., Tan, S. C., & Wong, L. H. (2021). Designing and implementing a locally developed coding curriculum: A case study in Singapore. Educational Technology Research and Development, 69(4), 1955-1975.

Valls-Carol, R., de Mello, R. R., Rodríguez-Oramas, A., Khalfaoui, A., Roca-Campos, E., Guo, M., & Redondo, G. (2022). The critical pedagogy that transforms the reality. International Journal of Sociology of Education, 11(1), 58-71.