Customary Sources of International Humanitarian Law, Geneva Conventions and their Relationship with the Second Additional Protocol of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 Relating to the Protection of Victims in the Non- International Armed Conflicts

Safet Krasniqi; Rilind Hoti; Valton Shala; Mirvete Uka

doi:10.55544/ijrah.3.2.19

Authors

Safet Krasniqi Assistant Professor, Faculty of Law, University “Ukshin Hoti” of Prizren, KOSOVA.
Rilind Hoti Student, Faculty of Law, University “Ukshin Hoti” of Prizren, KOSOVA.
Valton Shala Student, Faculty of Law, University “Ukshin Hoti” of Prizren, KOSOVA.
Mirvete Uka Sc., Mirvete Uka, KOSOVA

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.3.2.19

Keywords:

Additional Protocol II, International Conflicts, International Customs, Geneva Conventions

Abstract

This paper will address the importance of customary humanitarian law as a source of international humanitarian law which is one of the main pillars in the protection of human rights and freedoms during the war. The focus of the paper is the importance of the Geneva Conventions of 1949 and the second additional protocol dealing with the protection of victims during non-international armed conflicts.

The purpose of this paper is to analyze the actual role of the Geneva Conventions and Additional Protocol II in providing legal protection to individuals in non-international armed conflicts. Article 3, is a common Article for all the Geneva Conventions of 1949, which aims to assist and serve as a mandatory norm in non-international armed conflicts. On the other hand, this Article is "assisted" by the second additional protocol which provides slightly more explanations separately from these conventions, regarding the protection of victims during armed conflicts of a non-international character. We are witnessing that the world is evolving more and more every day and armed conflicts are becoming more and more frequent due to different interests that certain social groups have. In this regard, it is necessary to draft more detailed norms with binding force for the parties to the conflict, in order to reduce or avoid consequences on people. The question raised in this paper is: why should the Additional Protocol II to the Geneva Conventions be binding and enforceable along with the four 1949 Conventions? In this paper, the case of Kosovo will be addressed. In this paper are used the analysis, comparison, historical methods of research.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

References

Academy, R. G. (2017). Classification of armed conflicts. Retrieved from https://www.rulac.org/classification#collapse1accord

Academy, R. G. (2017). Classification of armend conflicts,. Retrieved from https://www.rulac.org/classification#collapse1accord

Britannica. (n.d). Politics, Law & Government : International Relations : Geneva Conventions. Retrieved from Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/event/Geneva-Conventions

D., S. (1997). The Different Types of Armed Conflicts According to the Geneva Conventions and Protocols. RCADI.

Ditore, K. (1998, july 12). Jakup Krasniqi interview in Koha Ditore.

Ditore, K. (1999, August 26). KLA Communique No.51. Koha Ditore.

Europe, R. F. (2020). Who are THEY: Over 1,600 missing persons. Retrieved from Radio Free Europe: https://www.evropaelire.org/a/kush-jane-te-pagjeturit-ne-kosove/30810611.html

H., H. (1993). International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction, in: Humanity for All: The International Red Cross and Red Crescent Movement. Paul Haupt Publishers.

H.P, G. (1994). International Humanitarian Law: An Introduction. Retrieved from International of Red Cross Review: https://international-review.icrc.org/articles/international-humanitarian-law-introduction

Heintze, H.J; Zwitter, A;. (2011). International Law and Humanitarian Assistance, A Crosscut Through Legal Issues Pertaining to Humanitarianism. Springer.

ICJ. (1945). Statute of the International Court of Justice.

ICJ. (1946). Permanent Court of International Justice. Statue of International Court of Justice, art. 38.

ICRC. (1949). Geneva Convention III of 1949 relating to the Treatment of Prisoners of War. Geneva Convention III of 1949 relating to the Treatment of Prisoners of War, Part Two, General Protection of Prisoners of War.

ICRC. (1977). Protocol I of Geneva Convection of 1949. Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949, and relating to the Protection of Victims of International Armed Conflicts (Protocol I), 8 June 1977.

ICRC. (2011). International Humanitarian Law and the Challenges of Contemporary Armed Conflicts,. 31st International Conference of the Red Cross and Red Crescent.

ICRC. (n.d). IHL Database: Customary IHL. Retrieved from ICRC: https://ihl-databases.icrc.org/customary-ihl/eng/docs/v1

ICRC. (n.d). Sources of IHL: Treaties and customary law. Retrieved from ICRC: https://blogs.icrc.org/ir/en/international-humanitarian-law/sources-ihl-treaties-customary-law/#:~:text='Treaty%20law'%20and%20'customary,States%20formally%20establish%20certain%20rules.

ICRC. (n.d.). The law of armed conflict: teaching file. Retrieved from ICRC: https://www.icrc.org/en/doc/resources/documents/misc/5p8ex4.htm

J., P. (1985). Development and Principles of International Humanitarian Law. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.

Milanovic, M; Hadzi-Vidanovic, V.;. (2012). A Taxonomy of Armed Conflict. SSRN. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1988915

Project, T. A. (1864). Laws of War: Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field (Red Cross Convention). Retrieved from The Avalon Project: https://avalon.law.yale.edu/19th_century/geneva04.asp

R., Jennings; Watts, A. (1996). OPPENHEIM'S INTERNATIONAL LAW. Oxford University Press.

School, C. L. (n.d). Geneva Convenction and their additional protocols. Retrieved from Cornell Law School: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/geneva_conventions_and_their_additional_protocols#:~:text=The%20Geneva%20Conventions%20and%20their,become%20victims%20of%20armed%20conflicts

The Declaration of Saint Petersburg . (1868). The Declaration of Saint Petersburg .

The Rambouillet Agreement . (1999).

UNTC. (2009). International Residual Mechanism for Criminal Tribunals. Retrieved from United Nations: https://www.icty.org/en/press/five-senior-serb-officials-convicted-kosovo-crimes-one-acquitted.

UNTC. (n.d.). Protocol Additional to the Geneva Conventions of 12 August 1949 and Relating to the Protection of Victims of Non-International Armed Conflicts (Protocol II). Retrieved from UNTC: https://treaties.un.org/pages/showDetails.aspx?objid=08000002800f3cb8

War, A. E.-P. (n.d). Treatment of American Prisoners of War In Southeast Asia 1961-1973. Retrieved from https://www.axpow.org/medsearch/: https://www.axpow.org/medsearch/southeastasia.pdf

Watch, H. R. (1999). FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF YUGOSLAVIA: Human Rights Developments. HRW.

Yugoslavia, i. C. (2012, November). Case no. IT-06-90-T, 2588, Case no. IT-06-90-A. Prosecutor v. Gotovina, 83-87. ITCY.

Yugoslavia, I. T. (n.d.). (Case no. IT-94-1-A, Appeals Chamber Judgment, (15 July 1999),. Prosecutor vs. Tadić, ( (International Tribunal for the Former Yugoslavia,15 July 1999), pp.68–145.