An Investigation into the Bill Part of Healthcare Professional in Clinical Health during COVID-19 Lockdown
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55544/ijrah.1.1.2Keywords:
COVID-19, healthcare, clinical, HCWs, challengingAbstract
In December 2019, a new coronavirus outbreak was recorded in Wuhan, China. This has expanded across the world to date, posing a host of major obstacles for healthcare professionals. They have been on the front lines of the epidemic reaction, and as a result, they are vulnerable to a variety of risks, including a significant risk of complications. Long and erratic duty periods in a highly restricted setting will lead to elevated anxiety levels and, eventually, burnout. HCWs can experience fear, hyperarousal, sleep disruption, unwanted recollections and memories, distress, and sadness as a result of seeing physical pain and mortality of patients with an immediate threat to one's protection. They will experience several external stress factors in the coming weeks and months. It is critical that concerted attempts are taken to reduce the pandemic's effects. To plan for a pandemic or some other public health crisis, psychological assistance, encouragement, and coordination are necessary. Pandemic readiness is a scarce financial and technological capability in developing countries. They still encounter several special and complex challenges, making pandemic preparedness much more challenging. This article discusses the problems posed by HCWs in developed countries during pandemics such as Covid-19, and also the steps required to protect workplace protection and psychological fellow human.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Organization WH. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19–11 March 2020. https://wwwwhoint/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020. 2020.
Organization WH. WHO Director-General’s opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19–3 April 2020. https://wwwwhoint/dg/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19--3-april-2020. 2020.
Dong E, Du H, Gardner L. An interactive web-based dashboard to track COVID-19 in real time. The Lancet Infectious diseases. 2020;20(5):533–4. Epub 2020/02/23. pmid:32087114.
Woolliscroft JO. Innovation in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic Crisis. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2020: pmid:32282372.
Sklar DP. COVID-19: Lessons From the Disaster That Can Improve Health Professions Education. Academic medicine: journal of the Association of American Medical Colleges. 2020: pmid:32544103.
Calhoun KE, Yale LA, Whipple ME, Allen SM, Wood DE, Tatum RP. The impact of COVID-19 on medical student surgical education: Implementing extreme pandemic response measures in a widely distributed surgical clerkship experience. Am J Surg. 2020;220(1):44–7. Epub 2020/04/28. pmid:32389331.
Akers A, Blough C, Iyer MS. COVID-19 Implications on Clinical Clerkships and the Residency Application Process for Medical Students. Cureus. 2020;12(4):e7800–e. pmid:32461867.
Khasawneh AI, Humeidan AA, Alsulaiman JW, Bloukh S, Ramadan M, Al-Shatanawi TN, et al. Medical Students and COVID-19: Knowledge, Attitudes, and Precautionary Measures. A Descriptive Study From Jordan. 2020;8(253). pmid:32574313
Ross DA. Creating a “Quarantine Curriculum” to Enhance Teaching and Learning During the COVID-19 Pandemic. Academic Medicine. 2020: Epub 2020/04/15. pmid:32744816
Chiodini J. Online learning in the time of COVID-19. Travel medicine and infectious disease. 2020;34:101669-. Epub 2020/04/11. pmid:32289547.
Mian A, Khan S. Medical education during pandemics: a UK perspective. BMC medicine. 2020;18(1):100. Epub 2020/04/10. pmid:32268900.
McCullough LB, Coverdale J, Chervenak FA. Teaching Professional Formation in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic. Academic Medicine. 2020:Epub 04/15. pmid:33006868
Chandra S, Laoteppitaks C, Mingioni N, Papanagnou D. Zooming-Out COVID: Virtual Clinical Experiences in an Emergency Medicine Clerkship. Medical education. 2020. Epub 2020/06/06. pmid:32502282.
Spitzer RL, Williams JB, Kroenke K, Linzer M, deGruy FV 3rd, Hahn SR, et al. Utility of a new procedure for diagnosing mental disorders in primary care. The PRIME-MD 1000 study. Jama. 1994;272(22):1749–56. Epub 1994/12/14. pmid:7966923.
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB. Validation and utility of a self-report version of PRIME-MD: the PHQ primary care study. Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders. Patient Health Questionnaire. Jama. 1999;282(18):1737–44. Epub 1999/11/24. pmid:10568646.
Arroll B, Goodyear-Smith F, Crengle S, Gunn J, Kerse N, Fishman T, et al. Validation of PHQ-2 and PHQ-9 to screen for major depression in the primary care population. Annals of family medicine. 2010;8(4):348–53. Epub 2010/07/21. pmid:20644190.
Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Archives of internal medicine. 2006;166(10):1092–7. Epub 2006/05/24. pmid:16717171.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Integrated Journal for Research in Arts and Humanities
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.